Category Archives: Morning Thoughts

Morning Thoughts (Jeremiah 12:5)

Jeremiah 12:5, "If thou hast run with the footmen, and they have wearied thee, then how canst thou contend with horses? and if in the land of peace, wherein thou trustedst, they wearied thee, then how wilt thou do in the swelling of Jordan?"

This morning, the world sometimes gets fuzzy-headed notions that regrettably creep into the church.  Since all of us still share in being a part of fallen creation, none of us are immune to wrong thinking in this world.  Have you ever heard someone say, "If things get rough, I'll hang tough" or "Some might fall, but I'll keep going" during an easy time?  Have all of us ever uttered similar sentiments?  All too often, these statements are made with the following two circumstances: 1. they are made when things are going well, 2. they are made even though little problems are not handled very honorably.  There is something in the pride of man that likes to think that he will shine above and beyond when no one else will, and though none of us knows for sure how we will react to some mammoth problem or towering adversity, we can glean some Biblical insight about ourselves and those possible future situations.

Jeremiah had perhaps one of the hardest "preaching assignments" known to man.  He prophesied in Judah before and after the destruction of Jerusalem at the hands of foreign Babylon.  He dealt with some of the most stiff-necked mentalities that a man has ever had to face in ministering God's word.  Through it all, the Lord blessed him in spite of some horrible outward circumstances.  Jeremiah was imprisoned, impoverished, despitefully used, and even double-crossed at times.  Though Jeremiah had moments of despondency and sorrow, he still faithfully served the Lord in spite of the hardships.  In our study verse, Jeremiah draws our minds to a very important principle of life that he had, no doubt, learned not just intellectually but also experientially.

If someone has never been in a war, there is an old saying from war veterans that states, "You never know for sure how you will react when that first bullet flies over your head."  As one who has never engaged in a bloody conflict of that sort, I must confess that I cannot answer with absolute certainty what I would do exactly in such a situation.  However, our Lord tells us faithfully in His word through verses like the one before us that how we handle certain situations is a good litmus test on how we will handle other situations.  Jeremiah draws the people's mind to two natural analogies.  The first analogy deals with different phases of a battle, while the other analogy deals with a contrast between war and peace.  In a nutshell, how we handle peace will be the manner in which we handle war.  In the way we handle one phase of the battle, we can have some assurance of handling the other phase of the battle the same way.  If honorably in one, then honorably in the other.  If dishonorably in one, then dishonorably in the other.

Let us begin with the second analogy and move into the first.  Jeremiah says that if we get weary in the land of peace where trust is found how can we expect to make it in the swelling of Jordan (wartime or time of trouble)?  That makes sense logically, yet so often we fail to look at things in that way.  For example, if someone cannot handle an assignment while in a vacuum and no outside hindrances, how could they hope to handle it when things are crowding in and the pressure mounts?  One of the things that good trainers attempt to do is accurately stage and mimic the circumstances of a contest or war during practice.  The mindset is simply this, "If you can handle it the way we throw it out at you, then you should be able to handle it when you are actually going through it."  So, a sergeant will stage a battle scene in training that has gunfire, explosions, etc. so that the troops will not experience those things for the first time in the real life battle.

Jeremiah's point is that people cannot hope to survive a war or time of trouble when they get weak and weary during a time of stillness and peace.  I fear that in this great nation in which we live our people generally do not know how to survive a time of trouble for the simple fact that they get weary during these times of peace and prosperity.  The great generation in this land that will soon leave us completely knew what it was like to survive a Great Depression and a World War.  They knew what it was like to meet national and international adversity head-on, and they still conducted themselves honorably – in a general sense.  No they were not perfect, but they handled that crisis in a generally honorable fashion.  Contrast that with the last 50 or so years.  The succeeding generations have handled some wars rather haphazardly, and the personal lives and health of the nation have also followed suit.  What if another Great Depression or World War broke out?  How would the nation, individuals, churches, families, etc. respond?  If in time of peace we have been wearied, how can one hope that we would not just falter and fail completely during a time of trouble?

Moving into the first analogy, consider a phase of battle.  Jeremiah says that if one cannot stand up with the footmen, then there is no real hope that he could survive the cavalry.  Consider the tactics of war, particularly from that time period.  After the opposing armies had engaged somewhat, the purpose of the cavalry was to exploit and break through any of the holes that the footmen had made.  So, what was the goal of the army before the cavalry rode down upon them?  The hope was that they would have little to no holes for opposing forces' horses to ride through.  If the holes were small to non-existent, the cavalry’s success would be greatly diminished.  If the footmen had been effective enough, the cavalry could break through.  If the footmen had been more than successful, the cavalry would absolutely cut whatever lines of men that were left to splinters.

Jeremiah's point is not that the cavalry has enough holes to break through.  Jeremiah's point is that the people have not stood up to the infantry at all, and therefore, the cavalry horses would cut what is left all to pieces.  When Satan comes calling in our lives, he does not start with the "big things" (horses).  He starts with the "little things" (footmen).  By doing so, the aim is to exploit our defenses sufficiently for the big things to pass through.  How is it today?  Today – as we previously stated – we have had times of rest, peace, etc. like no other.  Times have not been nearly as tough as they have been in days gone by, yet how have we stood up to the ploys of Satan?  Sadly, our lines look like we have been through a ravaging war rather than a time of extra-special peace.

I have no doubt from Scripture that things are going to continue to get worse.  Paul assured Timothy of that in II Timothy 3.  However, no matter how badly things generally get, we can still stand honorably during the times of trouble.  Nationally, we may crumble and fall.  Churches may – regrettably – close their doors for complete unfaithfulness to the Master.  However, let us never delude ourselves into thinking we will do better than others have if we have ample and sufficient evidence that we will not.  As I personally ponder my daily warfare and walk of discipleship, I see littered about many failures with the footmen.  I see much weariness in the land of peace.  If the pattern does not change, can I reasonably hope that my decorum will be better and more honorable with the horsemen or a swelling tide?  No I cannot.

Brethren, there is no way that I would compare myself to Jeremiah (and I frankly shudder when men compare themselves and this generation with Jeremiah and that generation).  However, the principle that Jeremiah espouses here is not only universal, but it is timeless as well.  If we have been faithful in little, we can hope that we will be faithful in much.  However, the converse is also true.  Let us who know the truth rearm ourselves for the fight.  Let us handle the small things honorably.  Let us meet the many little ploys of Satan in full, unbroken fashion.  During times of peace and practice, may we work up buckets of sweat to prevent gallons of blood being spilled in battle.  One of the ways that I am very much unlike Jeremiah is I have been given no vision or prophecy of the future in the land I live.  Jeremiah was plainly told by God what would happen, and he just as plainly declared that word to the people.  I do not know the future.  It feels and has the sense that things will get worse and much worse.  However, no matter what happens, may we as individuals, families, and churches stand united against the forces of darkness.  May we use these times of peace to stand honorably.  Then, no matter what comes may our honour in these times yield sufficient hope that we will stand equally solid in times of impending trouble.

In Hope,

Bro Philip

Morning Thoughts (II Corinthians 9:4)

II Corinthians 9:4, "Lest haply if they of Macedonia come with me, and find you unprepared, we (that we say not, ye) should be ashamed in this same confident boasting."

This morning, people can many times generate an "us vs. them" mentality that is destructive to growth and development.  Office environments where groups and clicks of people are at odds with each other keep the particular company from functioning at its optimal level.  In the church, it can be exponentially worse.  Whenever people or groups in a local body generate this mentality, proper growth and edification of the body is severely stunted.  Now, to carry the church and business illustration one step further, it behooves us to mention that this area of thought and discussion does not pertain to proper discipline or even loss of fellowship.  If someone in the body is guilty of public sin or doctrinal error, that is a matter of necessary discipline that does not pertain to an "us vs. them" scenario.  Just like in the office analogy, an employee not doing their job needs correction and perhaps even job termination.  Therefore, if we are talking about day-to-day fellowship, mutual encouragement, and abiding strength of one another's faith, we need to remember that the church exists as a singular body and not as groups of independent cells that are at odds with separate but similar groups.

From our study verse, we see that Paul is contextually speaking of a particular subject, but there is a thought nestled within this verse that can be broadened to more than the contextual subject matter.  Therefore, let us examine this thought first in its contextual light, but then broaden it out – in a Biblically supported fashion – to show how deeply it touches the fabric of the New Testament church.  Paul has just concluded a rather large point in the 8th chapter of being willing to suffer loss for other people's gain.  Not only is Christ the supreme example in this, but Paul labours to show how we should be good examples of that as well to those around us.  As the 9th chapter opens, Paul narrows the thought somewhat to discuss the helping of others through the act of parting with money or other goods.  In the first verse, Paul actually commends the Corinthian church for this very thing.  They have been good to relinquish money for the benefit and aid of those in need, and Paul will go further and talk about the church's responsibility in the care of the minister by the imparting of natural funds. 

Notice what Paul includes in this discussion from our verse.  In the parenthetical expression, he makes a specific point to show that the minister is every bit as involved and included in this discussion as anyone else.  Paul says "we" not "ye" when it comes to this particular thought.  There is perhaps not a more damaging "us vs. them" mindset in the church than the one where one of those groups is the preachers and the other being everyone else who is not a preacher.  As a side note, I have noticed in my personal experience a broadening chasm in this during my lifetime.  As a little boy in the church, it seemed from my observation that more people engaged the preachers outside of the assembly than they do today.  I have also heard many today say they are just uncomfortable talking to preachers, and when asked why, they have given varied and wide reasons.  Basically, though, most of them boil down to "well I'm not one of them."  Friends, you do not have to be a preacher to sit down and talk with one.  We are people with the same problems as anyone else.

On the flip side of that point, there have no doubt been preachers in time past to the present that consider themselves as some "elite class."  My natural father called it the "big boy country club" mindset.  Even though it is the opposite perspective, this thought is just as damaging to growth, edification, and well-being as the apprehension that some might feel to talk to a minister.  Paul makes a specific point to show that what he is talking about is a matter of "we" not "ye."  Paul is not talking to the church about their responsibility.  Paul is talking with the church about "our" responsibility.  So, having laid that groundwork, let us consider what our responsibility is both in the context and perhaps a bit broader.

As mentioned earlier, the context supports financial giving and obligation for the care of the saints.  While the church is not a social welfare program, she does have financial obligations both to the ministers that serve her as well as poor widows indeed within her.  Obviously, there is also natural care and keeping necessary if the church is blessed with natural grounds and a building.  Does the minister have equal responsibility in this financial regard and obligation?  Paul emphatically in this verse says that ministers do!  While ministers receive natural gifts from the church, that does not relinquish the minister's obligation and love-bound duty to "do his part" in the giving of his goods for the welfare of the church.  One of the deepest pits to fall into is for a minister to think the church "owes" him.  Friends, we owe God, and God has commanded that all of us give of ourselves – even naturally by way of finances – to the good and welfare of the church kingdom here in this world.

Since Peter encourages the elders to be "ensamples" to the flock in I Peter 5:3, a minister should "lead the way" in regards to giving and church support.  I remember after my father had first taken the care of a church that he pastored, he wrote a check on Sunday and placed it with all the other "moneys" that had been taken up that day.  When the deacons saw it, they all approached him (and I just happened to be sitting near him) and said, "Brother John, why did you write this check to the church?"  His response was, "As a member here, I have the same duty as anyone else."  They said, "But if you write a check to the church, we're just going to be giving it back to you when we write you a check."  His response was golden, "Then you take what money I give and put it somewhere that doesn't go to me.  Whether it helps keep up the cemetery, pay the light bill, or something, don't rob my joy of helping the church in her needs."  Brethren, the minister is not part of them.  There is not an "us vs. them;" it is just us – or it should be.

Now that we have examined the contextual thought that Paul had, let us consider a broader thought.  Paul ensures that the folks do not think he is talking to them but rather with them.  Whenever I first tried to start speaking and preaching, I went through the laborious process of listening to recordings of my efforts to pick out problems with my delivery and attempt to fix them.  More cruel torture there has never been!  However, I am convinced that it helped me a lot in those early days.  One of the things I noticed from my early efforts was a propensity to say "you" more than I said "we" or "our."  After making that realization, I attempted to remedy the usage to include myself in whatever discussion I was bringing out that day.  It is the same encouragement that I have tried to pass on to some others when I detect the same thing in their delivery.  It is good and Biblically proper for the congregation to feel that the man sent to them to minister, preach, and labour is "one of them."  He is not separate, but the concepts and subjects are for us, not you.  Therefore, we should speak of it from that perspective.

Therefore, sermons on redemption are not expressed that "you are redeemed" but that "we are redeemed."  Sermons on sin are not expressed as "you are sinners" but that "we are sinners."  When the minister includes himself in the concepts that are being expressed, the result is two-fold.  1.  The congregation loses the sense that the minister may be "talking down to them."  2.  The minister speaks as one of the group rather than a casual or interested bystander.  These two results bring the message home in ways it would not otherwise.  When a boss addresses his company through some speech or lecture, the workers understand that he is there and we are here.  However, when the minister addresses the body, the congregation should get the sense that we are all in this together.  Whether in the depths of sin and blackness by nature or in the bliss of redemption, honour, and glory by grace, all of us are included.  In this way (and definitely many others), preaching stands alone in its address.  Most all addresses and speeches in the world are done to the people, but preaching is done with the people.

One last thought about the minister being included is the sense in which exhortation, reproof, and instruction comes.  The Bible warns against undue judgments and Pharisaical mindsets.  So, if the preacher is included in the thoughts espoused, how does he address needed matters though guilty of them himself?  One of the primary complaints I hear from folks outside the church about folks in the church (and the preaching in particular) is this, "Those people are just as guilty of sin as I am.  Why do I have to listen to someone tell me about sin when he is a sinner?  God judges me, not him."  While it is true that churches all over the world are occupied by sinners – preachers included – there is no reason why the preaching should be perceived in such a fashion: provided the preaching is done correctly.  When the minister preaches or converses with others, the strength of our argument does not rest on our personal decorum.  Far from it.  The strength of it rests on the precepts of God in His word.

I will not lie; it is hard to preach on topics that I am flagrantly guilty of myself.  However, my impression to preach about it does not come from some ideal or mindset that I have kept it.  Rather, it comes from the deep conviction that God says it.  It is therefore true, and therefore worthy of proclamation.  When a minister proclaims something that he fails in, a good preacher worth his salt will freely confess to not measuring up to the standard.  That is why the exhortation is made to "us" and not "you."  Brethren, more than anything, the preacher should want unity of the body and harmony of the assembly.  True harmony comes from above and that must encompass all of us and not just some of us.  The next time you attend the house of God, look around.  Do you consider every single person there "us?"  May we not look at things in the church as "us" and "them."  May it just be "us" with all the focus, attention, and adoration toward Him.

In Hope,

Bro Philip