John 11:43, “And when he thus had spoken, he cried with a loud voice, Lazarus, come forth.”

This morning, language still has meaning. One of the earliest lessons about the Bible that I was taught as a little boy from my natural father was, “You can never hope to know what the Bible means if you don’t first know what it says.” To get the meaning and the message that God has left on record for us, we have to be acquainted with the Bible’s language. By understanding language, we can then build the language into secure and solid building blocks of concepts. Those concepts are in turn then laid together to form the structure of Biblical theology as a house that both shines as a testimony to God’s work and an example for our course here below. Without the understanding of language, we fail to make blocks (or perhaps worse make unsteady blocks that cannot hold weight). Without blocks that can be laid together, we have no structure as a house and shield in the world. We then become ignorant, forget about God’s grace, and wander aimlessly in our daily struggles. Let us choose the former path that keeps a good house of Biblical thought built upon the language of the Bible itself.

As we have already mentioned in our previous writing, Christ’s spoken language in the account of Lazarus in John 11 was for our benefit to understand what He did, how He did it, and what it means. Progressing into this three word sentence of Christ, we will see some beautiful particulars about the Lord’s call, and from that, we glean rich insights into the overall scope of the Lord’s work in this regard. However, for starters, we need to make some qualifying statements. While we will use Christ’s language to make a comparison to the effectual call in the new birth (and by extension the resurrection), this account details bringing a naturally dead man back to natural life again. What Lazarus experienced in reality (natural raising), points to what God’s family experiences in spiritual raising.

The first word of Christ’s sentence is “Lazarus.” We have often heard it said, “Had Christ not spoken Lazarus’ name, all the graves would have opened and come forth.” While that statement sounds good and comforting superficially (i.e. it seems to lend strength to the power of Christ’s voice), it actually diminishes the power and might of God’s purpose. Had Christ only purposed to raise Lazarus and not spoken his name, only Lazarus’ body would have been raised due to the purpose of Christ Jesus the Lord. Christ could have said nothing at all, “come forth,” etc. and only Lazarus would have been raised if that was Christ’s purpose.

However, by utilizing the name Lazarus in His address, Christ gives us insight into the effectual call. First of all, it is personal. We oftentimes hear people talk about a “personal Saviour.” According to Biblical theology – characterized by Christ’s address here – the Saviour must be personal. He came on this occasion for the raising of a particular man, and His work in the great economy of salvation is not for the general saving of an indiscriminate mass of humanity. As Paul describes it, Christ did it for “me” out of love for “me.” (Galatians 2:20) Doubtless, Lazarus could say that Christ came that day for him personally. While I have no recollection of the exact moment of my regeneration, I like to think that His voice spoke the word “Philip” into my heart.

Since the call in the resurrection is similar to regeneration (see correlation between John 5:25 and 5:28-29), the same personal aspect holds true when He comes to call our old bodies out to be fashioned like unto His glorious body. While countless millions will be raised in a moment, we will all be visited personally by Christ. What He did He did for us personally, and all aspects of that work will be seen to in a personal fashion on a personal basis. Some might say, “How would millions of people simultaneously hear their own individual names at that moment?” Nothing is too hard for the Lord, and we will be able to not only say, “He loved me and gave Himself for me, but He came and got me personally.” (I Thessalonians 4:16-17)

The second word of Christ’s sentence is “come.” If the first word denoted the personal nature of the call, this word denotes the authority and power of the call. Notice that this word has no qualifiers, additions, etc. to go with the command. It is simple. Come. Now, looking at this naturally, I tell my children to come quite often on a daily basis. Sometimes, my voice is successful, and sometimes it is not. While the children deal with the consequences of willfully avoiding and not heeding my voice, such is not the circumstance with God. When He speaks, it is done. (Psalm 33:9) Consider also that I am telling living children to come with fair to moderate success. He is telling dead children to come with 100% success. How infinite and authoritative is the power of this One!

Lazarus did not say, “Not today Lord. Maybe tomorrow if I feel like it.” Doing some field work yesterday, I had the opportunity to listen (albeit briefly) to a radio preacher say these words, “It is the Holy Spirit’s function to give the new birth. It’s His job. We must let Him work and give us the relationship that matches our standing with God.” He went on to declare that we already have good standing with God – through Christ’s death – but the relationship is not cemented until we let the Holy Spirit through the door. Should this statement be true, we have a division and disharmony of power in the Godhead. Indeed, Christ can make us just and grant good standing in the halls of heaven, but the Holy Spirit is helpless and powerless to consummate that relationship unless we “let Him?” Isaiah plainly states that the Lord will work and who shall let it. (Isaiah 43:13)

When the power of Christ speaks life into the body of Lazarus, heart and soul in the new birth, or the resurrection at the end of time, the effect is immediate with force of power to fulfill the command. Lazarus was dead, and given a command. Naturally this does not work. Dead alien sinners are spoken to by God with a command. Bodies gone into the ground decay and have gone back to dust, but will one day be commanded to live and come. The reason that the dead do not stay dead nor disobey the command is because the command contains life, and with the life the draw to do what is commanded. (John 6:37, 44) Job never hinted at the possibility of refusal to obey this call (Job 14:14-15); Christ never admitted one iota of possibility that His work in ANY count come to nought. (John 10:27-30)

The final word “forth” brings the thought full circle. We have a personal call that is effectual in power by command, but the word “forth” denotes not the power or the personality of the call but the direction of it. Lazarus was not called out to some unspecified location, left to his own devices to “finally make it,” persevere long enough to outrun the devil into heaven, or any other erroneous teaching that is promoted from time to time. Christ called (commanded) Lazarus to a direction of “forth.” That word, when spoken in this way, literally means that the direction implied is towards the speaker. Christ’s direction by command of call was to Him! Lazarus was not called half-way, part-way, but all the way to Christ. This direction shows completion. What Christ did, He completed totally and fully.

Had Lazarus been given life and then told to “get all the way to Christ,” he still would have failed. How many of us, even after being given life, have lived a perfect day? Should any be so bold to claim such holiness, how about a perfect week, month, or year? Unless Christ did the work all the way, and thereby commanded us all the way to Him, we would have an unpopulated heaven and brimming capacity of hell. To show how secure our direction and conclusion with Christ is, let us consider how David describes being called out of a deplorable state.

In Psalm 40:2, David describes the work of the Lord in pulling him from the horrible pit and miry clay. However, David does not leave us to wonder what the Lord did after that. After pulling him out, God set his feet upon a rock and established his goings. The word “set” means to complete and secure something, as we today often speak of “setting concrete.” Once concrete has reached its “set” point of hardening, it is there, like it or not. If one does not like it, you either bust it up and start over or deal with it. Since no one can bust up Christ’s work, our best course is to thankfully view it with reverence and praise. What God did in setting David’s feet upon a rock shows security in the work.

Still, look at David’s ultimate completion: “established my goings.” By comparing Hebrew words, the English words “set” and “established” come from the same Hebrew word. Therefore, the security we ascribe to David’s position on the rock (Christ), is the same security we ascribe to his goings. Now, the fatalist might delightfully state, “Aha! What David did from that moment on was just as bedrock as his position on Christ.” Is that what David meant? Such would contradict the highest tenor of Scriptural injunction for us to walk in a godly way and keep ourselves unspotted from the world. (James 1:27)

Instead, what David means is that his “goings” are just as secure and complete as his position. Someone’s “goings” references their end. Like the end of a journey, the final place is “established.” David’s intended thought is that heaven awaiting at the end of his journey is just as bedrock as his current position on the Rock of Jesus Christ. Lazarus was called by Christ’s command to a position not a fraction short of being where Christ was. While I do not know how far Lazarus’ body physically had to come to be with Christ, he came forth however far that was to be with Christ.

This directional word should spark the highest sense of comfort in us that His work is not only authoritative but carries the fullest sense of completion down throughout all the ages of time and into the ceaseless age of eternity. We have not been called one fraction of a step short, but to come “forth:” directed right to where He is. On that day, Lazarus was directed to Christ’s physical position. One sweet day, our person in its entirety (body, soul, and spirit) will be directed to the very portal of heaven to be with Christ where He is. (John 14:1-6) Is it sure? Yea, indeed it is just as sure as our current position and standing on the Rock of our Saviour.

Friends, while Christ was not required to speak, we should delight in these three little – yet powerful – words that speak volumes into the work of Christ in the salvation of His people. From these three words, language is used to build the blocks of personal salvation, effectual and authoritative power of God, and completion of salvation to its fullest degree. These blocks are then, in turn, laid together as part of the building that heralds and cries unto the majesty of “grace” by God to unworthy dead men. This edifice of grace and love serves as a shelter from life’s evils and sufficient motivation to live a life of thanksgiving unto the One that has done all this. Who shall keep Him from it? Not one, but may we look with thanksgiving upon Him and His most blessed work.

In Hope,

Bro Philip

John 11:42-43, “And I knew that thou hearest me always: but because of the people which stand by I said it, that they may believe that thou hast sent me. And when he thus had spoken, he cried with a loud voice, Lazarus, come forth.”

This morning, motives are difficult to detect. When a person’s mouth says one thing and his actions another, we puzzle as to his motivation(s). Further still, sometimes people act in certain ways for the benefit of others. For example, someone may share a personal experience with a friend to help console or build up their friend during a difficult situation. Knowing that others have been in similar situations can bolster the resolve of someone to shoulder on. However, consider the exact same scenario under different motivating factors. What if someone told his friend a personal experience that might “seem” to strengthen his friend but in reality take the light off the hearer’s situation and put it on the teller? The motivating factor could be to gain compassion, pity, or otherwise from the other party. Both stories carry similar storylines, but they stem from highly polarized motivations.

Many times, we might read the Scriptures and wonder, “Why did Christ do that?” I remember as a younger and ignorant boy wondering why Christ did not just wait to perform miracles the day after the sabbath to keep people from persecuting him. To the natural mind, that makes sense, and it makes sense even to synagogue rulers. (Luke 13:14) Still, whether I ever discover the motivating factor for Christ’s actions or not, one thing should be abundantly clear and undeniable: all of His motivations were as equally pure and just as the actions themselves. (John 8:29) Should we never know anything about some of the things He did or why, we can rest assured that they are all in Him yea and amen to the praise and glory of God. (II Corinthians 1:20) However, Christ does not leave us in doubt on numerous occasions as to why He does what He does.

Our study verses above are from the near conclusion of the account of Lazarus being raised back to life by our Lord and Saviour. However, Christ, in the context, sets the record straight on many things before He actually raises Lazarus up. Early on, He instructs His disciples on the concept that death of the body to them is but sleep to His perspective. Martha is instructed not to refer to the resurrection as an actual day but the substance and reality of it being Christ Himself. Furthermore, He declares to His Father the reason and motivation for His verbal speaking on this earth.

Honest question: had Christ never opened His mouth to declare one solitary thing about His work of redemption and atonement, would He have ascended to heaven any less victorious in that work? The simple answer is that “no” He would not have been any less victorious in that. The declaration of something does not make it so, but the declaration of something professes what is already so. Therefore, Christ did not open His mouth in verbal speaking to make something so. Rather, He opened His mouth to declare what is so. The power of God Almighty does not require Him to verbally speak to accomplish His purpose. Should He choose just to have the thought, the purpose will be accomplished just as His thought designed it to be, although He does oftentimes from Scriptural record speak audibly when accomplishing His purpose. (John 5:25)

Another honest question: should we be thankful that Christ did open His mouth to declare His work of redemption and atonement among other things? The simple answer should resound in a constant “yes” of thanksgiving that He did. Christ freely professes to the Father in our verses that He is not speaking for His benefit – nor the Father’s for that matter. He speaks for the benefit of those that stood by. They, as we today, are sad creatures of doubt. Doubting creatures must have things affirmed and reaffirmed. Had Christ ever said that the Father sent Him? Yes, John 6:37-40 says so. Yet, here Christ again affirms the point that by speaking audibly to the Father, those standing by – and yea even us today – will know and understand that this One is always heard in heaven and indeed was sent from heaven.

While we will attempt, in a later writing, to address the last and most often described phrase from verse 43, let us ponder the ramifications and motivation for the opening phrases of verse 43. Jesus has already clearly stated His motivation and reasoning for even speaking audibly. Now, He increases the level by crying in a loud voice. What could possibly motivate such a thing? Was a loud voice necessary to reach Lazarus’ dead ears? As already previously stated, the Deity need never utter audible syllables to accomplish His purpose, for the purpose of His pleasure can be effectual with or without voice. Furthermore, volume is not what affects the dead, for the variance of sound (volume) is not perceived by the dead.

Let us notice some of the particulars of this scene in conjunction with Christ’s loud voice. Looking at the context of this chapter, Christ intentionally waited before coming to Bethany, making His arrival 4 days after Lazarus’ death. Indeed, when word first reached Christ, Lazarus was reported as simply sick, but He purposely waits and arrives “4 days late” by the world’s standards. While the Scriptures do not explicitly state why, what might we infer from this? Certainly, Christ was not being cruel to this family that He loved. Such is against His nature. What was Martha’s protest when He commanded that the stone be rolled away? She protested that his body was already decaying and highly pungent to the smell. (Verses 38-39)

When that stone was rolled away, the odious scent of death no doubt came pouring forth from that tomb. No one on that occasion would dare doubt that this man was really and truly dead. Indeed, we might infer from Christ’s action to wait before coming that He would put away any proof that someone might have of this mighty miracle that He would perform. Death reeked on that occasion, but Life stands to overcome that power and its associated smell. Therefore, knowing that no one could doubt the fact of Lazarus’ death, what other tactic might the critic employ? How else could he attribute this wondrous work to trickery? If one cannot condemn the party being raised, he must condemn the party doing the raising.

The critic could employ the tactic, “Was his voice really what did it? Surely the dead was really dead because of the smell, but did the man Jesus really do it? How do we know?” While the Scriptures do not specify how many were gathered on that occasion, the implication is that it was more than a few. (Verses 31-37) By crying in a loud voice, Jesus removes any possible doubt the critic might use to deny the correlation between His voice and the raising of the dead man. The volume did not make the work any more or less powerful, but it manifested to a greater degree to all there present that surely this One really and truly did do this.

After all, His speaking in the first place was for all those people there present to benefit – in a knowledge way – from what He did on this occasion. Those same words are inspirationally penned and preserved for us today so that we might all benefit as well. When His voice echoed around Calvary, “Eli, Eli, la-ma sa-bach-tha-ni?” that loud declaration was for our benefit to have some knowledge of what He went through for us. (Matthew 27:46) Even though darkness reigned upon the earth at the ninth hour when He declared that loudly from the cross, none present could deny hearing the voice of Him who said it. These and other loud declarations do not carry more “voice power” than His “even toned” dialogues, but they do serve to show us His motivations for speaking and sometimes speaking in such a loud fashion.

While the critic still walks the earth seeking to deny the work of our blessed Saviour, may we cling to those precious words that His lips uttered. Those words to not make reality, but thanks be unto Him that He was pleased to declare reality on these occasions for us. Thanks be unto Him that we have audibly expressed unto us, “It is finished,” (John 19:30) “Father, into thy hands I commend my spirit,” (Luke 23:46) and others. Thanks be unto Him that certain occasions were marked by loud speaking to remove all justification for doubtful disputations. Thanks even more unto Him for mercifully affirming and reaffirming these things in His word and in our lives so that the clouds of doubt that seem to linger and loom so often get burned away in the rays of His glorious sunshine.

In Hope,

Bro Philip