Category Archives: Morning Thoughts

Philip Conley's Morning Thoughts

Morning Thoughts (II Corinthians 8:13-15 – “Equality”)

“Equality”

II Corinthians 8:13-15, “For I mean not that other men be eased, and ye burdened: But by an equality, that now at this time your abundance may be a supply for their want, that their abundance also may be a supply for your want: that there may be equality: As it is written, He that had gathered much had nothing over; and he that had gathered little had no lack.”

This morning, many fantastical notions abound about what the Bible says about different things. A simple perusal of contemporary Christian literature shows a litany of fable-like thinking. Christian bookstores carry titles from subjects about how to work your way to heaven to what people think is going to happen between now and the eventual return of our Lord. Perhaps one of the most insidious concepts to creep into Christian circles from a practical point of view is the idea that the Bible teaches a form of socialism as its structure for Godly living and civilization building. While there are different models of government and society that can be implemented to good effect, it should be obvious just from common word usage that the Bible does not support socialism as a mindset for believers to follow in their service as our thinking should be geared into thinking of living in a kingdom serving the King! It is not my intent to go on a political diatribe in this writing, but we do sincerely want to show some of what the Bible says about equality in our lives and how we should approach it and try to accomplish it.

Texts and passages like our study verses above are sometimes employed to bolster a mindset that Christians should be socialistic or “commune” based. The stated goal of a communistic or socialistic society is for everyone to be equal. History has shown repeatedly that these models fail over and over again at the community or civil level. What may look good on paper or sound good to the ear simply does not stand up when people are inserted into the equation with our plentitude of problems stemming from the sinful nature that hampers all of us. Utopia will not be found as long as sin remains, and sin shall remain in the world as long as time stands. But, since these verses talk about our “societal” interactions with other believers and also talk about equality, how should we approach passages like this?

The line of thought that Paul has begun really begins well before this (even chapters before this), but he makes a nice summation point in Verse 9. That verse gives as good an applied definition of “grace” as the Bible has. What is grace? How does it look? Paul says that grace in application is the richest of the rich (Jesus) becoming poor so that the poor would be rich. Surely considering what the Bible says about our King, He owns everything. Glory beyond our imagination is His, yet He laid all that aside to come to this sin cursed earth. While on earth, He still owned the earth and its fullness, but He lived in a way that owned very little. Even as a grown man, He walked with 12 other men, and they shared a common bag for all their needs without even a roof over Him to call “home.” (John 13:29, Matthew 8:20) He lived as a poor man, but His real poverty came when He went to Calvary and was rejected by all to the point of forsakenness by His Father. This lonely time brought all our sin-cursed poverty into complete remission. For that, we have been raised to a place of riches that can only be imagined.

This summation point launches Paul into his thinking about equality in our verses, but also tinged upon something else. Using Christ’s example, Paul encourages believers to help others in dire need as Christ helped those in dire need. How does that start? In Verse 12, Paul says the first requirement is a willing mind. Perhaps this point is where most models of socialistic society fail and flounder. People coerced into something will not perform as they could, and the bare minimum is all that they will expend. Christ was interested in us. He was not coerced into it, and He willingly went to death for the ransom of His people. Paul says that our service to mark the path that His took requires first a willing mind. We should desire to help others not have our arm twisted into it.

So, with Christ as an example and a willing mind in place, how do we view these verses? Paul says the purpose of equality is not for people to get a “free ride.” (Verse 13) The burden of giving should not indulge the lazy. Again, socialistic and communistic models can encourage laziness in those doing nothing to continue doing so. In another place, Paul lays a foundational point that work should be a necessity for eating. (II Thessalonians 3:10) Christ did not redeem us from our sins to indulge laziness. Rather, He commands us to walk worthy of the vocation that He has called us to. Surely, though at rest, we will not “laze about heaven” like a lord on a cloud. Rather, we will be employed in complete, perfect, and total worship of the highest order world without end.

The purpose of giving to equality is really lined out in verse 14. Paul shows that when people help others, those people actually help them too. Read the verse carefully, and both groups end up being “helped” and “helpers.” Any minister can attest that in ministering to the poor, infirmed, widows, or deathbeds of saints that we have been “helped” as much – if not more – than we helped with our presence and ministration. We go to these poor and afflicted saints to help them by cheering their way and end up being cheered ourselves at seeing such faith and steadfastness even in the face of life’s afflictions. One of the highest joys one can experience is gathered round the bed of a saint soon to pass from this shore to the world above and see the great victory that they feel. You can see the way they feel as it is tattooed all over their person. They know “home” is near, and they desire nothing more.

The equality comes in the sense that we are all in need (just in different ways), and while we help others with their needs, they in turn help us with ours as well. Some people may need help monetarily, while others may need help emotionally. No matter the need, we are equals. As poor and needy creatures, we all stand in need, whether we confess it or not. Paul’s point of labour here is not socialistic modality, but rather showing us all in need. He will then further illustrate this point in Verse 15 by pointing them to the children of Israel in the wilderness.

When the Israelites gathered manna in Moses’ day, they were equals. No, they did not gather equal amounts. Paul drives that point home. Some gathered much and some gathered little (needs were different), but whatever the need, they were sufficed. So, they were equal in that God gave them their sufficiency to sustain them those 40 years wandering in the wilderness, but consider that even though the little had no lack, the much had nothing over as well. In other words, they were also equals in the sense that every day they both stood in need all over again. Is that not how we are equal today? We stand in need of Him each day. What if we had much yesterday? We freshly need Him again today. What if we had just a little yesterday? We also freshly need Him today too.

So many times we play the “comparison game” (which is never wise – II Corinthians 10:12), but loudly complain that we want “equality.” Really, discussions today about equality – whether socially or otherwise – are generally just complaining sessions wherein people covet what someone else has that they do not. Brethren, God hates covetousness as it is equivalent to idolatry (Colossians 3:5) and rather requires us to do what we can. (Mark 14:8) As Paul showed in our study verses, we are not to think about what we can or cannot do based on what we do not have but based on what we do. Is it about the talents that I do not have? No! It is about applying the ones He did give me. If we really added up all the time we compare and complain, how much time would that be that could be employed and implemented in a profitable way? Sobering thought indeed.

Thankfully, though we are equals in the sense of having needs and standing daily in need of Him, I love the thought that we will one day be equals in all things. Circling back to Verse 9, the end result of being made rich is that we are as rich as He is. Though He willingly laid it down for us, as a risen and ruling King, He still owns all things. He is God the Father’s only Begotten Son. We are His joint-heirs (Romans 8:17) meaning that each and every member of His family owns the same thing that He does! What a concept! Further, we will all have equal standing in His presence in the heavenly portal with equal perfection offering up the same song of praise and worship throughout eternity. Until that day, may we do what we can, remembering what we are, how much we need Him, and how much He has done for us.

In Hope,

Bro Philip

Morning Thoughts (Acts 26:8)

Philip Conley's Morning Thoughts

Acts 26:8, “Why should it be thought a thing incredible with you, that God should raise the dead?” 

This morning, people still find many Biblical tenets fantastically unbelievable, and most of the incredulity stems from inability to understand it fully.  For example, many today will deny that Jesus Christ is fully God as well as fully man, since that concept blows the mind’s circuits.  The fact that such a concept is a mystery is undeniable (I Timothy 3:16), but mysteries do not necessarily entail an untruth.  Much of life is a mystery to me, but my lack of understanding does not change the existence of these truths.  For some, the idea of the resurrection of our bodies when time shall be no more is thought to be so utterly fantastic that it is nothing more than a children’s fairy tale.  However, to someone who knows something of Biblical foundations, the idea should not be unbelievable but completely believable.

Our study verse is set in the midst of Paul’s appearance before King Agrippa.  He has already made his case before Felix and then Festus, but King Agrippa’s arrival warrants another hearing.  So, Paul stands before these 3 magistrates, but primarily speaks to Agrippa since he had already spoken to the other two.  Paul actually enjoyed this hearing (Verse 2), and the reason for that happiness is found in verse 3, setting the stage for the premise of all of Paul’s arguments.  Agrippa, unlike other magistrates, had a good knowledge of the Jews’ religion, customs, and beliefs about various things.  Because of this knowledge, Paul hinges many of his arguments on the teachings of the prophets of the Old Testament, but his questions hinge upon Agrippa’s understanding of the power and consistency of God as well.

If Agrippa knew what the Jews thought and had in the Old Testament, then he knew the Genesis account of the creation.  Knowing that the Book described an entire universe formed out of nothing, Paul presses the argument.  If God can create something from nothing, how hard would it be for Him to take that something and fashion it again as something?  The resurrection is not a new body, but a change of the old body.  No matter the condition, the resurrection starts with the premise that the remains of the body are fashioned again into another body (Job 19:24-25).  For someone who had not heard of or been acquainted with the God of the Old Testament, the resurrection could be an incredible thing, but for people who believe in the literal creation of the universe from nothing by God, the resurrection should be well within His power.

Furthermore, Agrippa had other accounts familiar to him.  Notice the language of verse 3 again.  Agrippa was not just casually acquainted with these things.  He was an expert in all questions and customs among the Jews.  Therefore, he knew more than just that there were prophets like Isaiah and Jeremiah, he had read them extensively and heard many of the discussions about the harder questions of the law.  Many times in writing his defenses of the resurrection, like in I Corinthians 15, Paul would quote extensively from the Old Testament.  The writings of the prophets bear great testimony to the truth of the raising from the dead. (Isaiah 25:8 as a good example) Therefore, the concept of the resurrection should not have been alien to Agrippa on that level.

Another appeal that Paul had from Scripture was that the Old Testament linked the resurrection by illustration to nature.  Job describes this in Job 14:1-15.  In Job’s declaration of life after death, he mentions the observation of a tree that is cut down.  Though the tree is gone with nothing but the aging roots in the ground, yet through the presence (scent) of water, it will sprout again.  Even nature’s courses (set in place by a very intelligent Creator) show forth the reality of life after recession through the season’s courses and the examples of things like trees that Job gives us.  Agrippa was more familiar with these things than other people that Paul stood before.  As Paul’s discourse ellipses back to the resurrection in Acts 26, it causes Festus to accuse Paul of insanity for believing these things.  To some today, someone would have to be incredibly insane to believe the truth that we shall be raised from the grave some sweet day.

Beloved, today we should look at Paul’s question as though he asked it to us.  Why should it be thought incredible that God should raise the dead?  Do we believe that He verily created something from nothing?  Amen and amen.  Do we believe that all that the prophets declared is verily true and without error?  Amen again.  Do we see and observe the change and “rebirth” cycles in nature?  Surely so.  Why with all this evidence screaming about should the resurrection be thought incredible to us?

Most of the incredulity about the event stems from lack of ability to grasp it.  I freely confess that the idea of “sleeping dust” coming forth in an instant to be fashioned into a glorious immortal body is more than my mind can logically project or fathom.  I simply have no experience comparison with which to base it.  However, the reality and power of that event does not hinge upon my ability to mentally project it.  It is grounded in the reality that the heart of the resurrection – Jesus Himself – has all power in both heaven and earth.  He can do – and does – whatsoever He will.  No matter the condition of the “dust,” it shall come forth.  Burned, consumed, torn of beast, or scattered to the far corners of the globe, none of it has landed outside the watchful eye of Him who shall one day raise it.  Incredible?  Let us not be found thinking so, but rather let us be found rejoicing in hope of the glory of God knowing that one day we shall stand before Him wholly in not only spirit and soul but body as well.

In Hope,

Bro Philip